While it seems that much has been going on in the market recently, the truth is that price-wise, Bitcoin has been ranging between the $60k to $73k level for over one and a half months. As discussed in length, a period of consolidation like this was expected and the base scenario is still a breakout to the upside. But this scenario can take time to materialise itself and in the meantime, the short term direction of the market will likely be influenced by the short term news of the week.
Hong Kong's spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF will begin trading on April 30th. This will be an important event to monitor, as various elements suggest it could act as a positive catalyst for the crypto market.
First, when we step back and examine the success of the Bitcoin spot ETF in the US, there is reason to believe that there is strong demand for a Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF in Hong Kong, especially considering that Asia represents a larger market than the US for crypto, as illustrated by this graph :
Another element to consider when analysing the impact of the new ETFs in Hong Kong is to look at the cumulative returns by geographic trading sessions for Bitcoin. Here, what we observe is a clear divergence, with APAC (Asia) leading strongly (27.46%) ahead of Europe (22.24%) and the US (16.1%).
This reinforces the idea that the potential impact of the ETFs in Hong Kong could be underestimated and that, in reality, it could have a larger-than-expected impact on the market, and led to a strong surge in demand for crypto assets.
Last week, the US GDP (gross domestic product) data came in lower than expected. Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 1.6%, well below the 2.4% expectation. This is a net decrease from the previous quarter where real GDP increased 3.4% in Q4 2023 marking a slowdown in growth.
Analysing the components of GDP in more details , we note the following:
The paradox here is that while GDP growth is slowing down, the decomposition of real GDP growth, mainly the growing share of personal consumption services and strong imports does not signal a weak economy. In fact, importing a lot of goods and spending money on services are more signals of a thriving and rich economy.
What’s the implication of this for markets?
In addition to the lower than expected growth in GDP, we also have persistent inflation in the US , as shown by the revival of the uptrend in US Core PCE data.
The only pieces of data that are still strong are around the labour market and employment. Knowing that employment data is usually a lagger, a fair question to ask ourselves is: Are we slowly entering into a new era of stagflation? And what could be the implication for markets?
Stagflation is characterised by a stagnant economy, persistent inflation and high unemployment. Historically, this is the worst economic environment for markets. To reinforce this argument, this is the historical performance of different asset class in this economic regime:
We note that in the past, gold and commodities (hard assets basically) were the best performers while US equities had a negative performance. Crypto, on the other hand, never went through this economic regime so there is no past data to analyse. However, it seems reasonable to think that Bitcoin, the hardest asset of all, should react like gold. But for the rest of the crypto market, things are less clear.
In any case, stagflation is not the end of the story and things are really different this cycle because of something that we’ve already talked about in length: Fiscal dominance and Quantitative Support (QS) that is impacting market dynamics and are pushing asset prices higher. For now, this should dominate over macro variables.
Disclaimer: The information contained in or provided from or through this article (the "Article") is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, trading advice, or any other type of advice, and should not be interpreted or understood as any form of promotion, recommendation, inducement, offer or invitation to (i) buy or sell any product, (ii) carry out transactions, or (iii) engage in any other legal transaction. This article should be considered as marketing material and not as the result of financial research/independent investments.
Neither SBorg SA nor its affiliates (“Entities”) make any representation or warranty or guarantee as to the completeness, accuracy, timeliness or suitability of any information contained within any part of the Article, nor to it being free from error. The Entities reserve the right to change any information contained in this Article without restriction or notice. The Entities do not accept any liability (whether in contract, tort or otherwise howsoever and whether or not they have been negligent) for any loss or damage (including, without limitation, loss of profit), which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information and/or from the Article.